Perigon vs APITube: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Perigon (4.5/5) edges ahead of APITube (3.5/5) overall. Perigon is the better choice for startups wanting enriched news with transparent tiers. APITube is the stronger option for developers willing to trial a newer, feature-rich API. The right pick depends on your budget, how much history you need and whether you need full text.
Perigon vs APITube: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Perigon | APITube |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2022 | Not disclosed |
| HQ | Austin, Texas, USA | Not publicly disclosed (developer profile lists Texas, USA) |
| Team size | 11–50 | Not publicly disclosed |
| Rating | 4.5 / 5 | 3.5 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Published plans from $25 with enrichment and saved-query monitors included | Entity and sentiment filters offered on lower tiers |
| Pricing model | Monthly plans; add-ons for real-time and volume | Monthly plans; free tier |
| Entry price | $25/mo | See pricing page |
| Formats & SDKs | REST API, JSON, Python SDK | REST API, JSON |
| Typical uses | AI & LLM apps, Media monitoring, Risk & compliance, Marketing & PR | News & content apps, AI & LLM apps, Media monitoring |
Perigon vs APITube: overview
Perigon
Perigon was founded in 2022 by Joshua Dziabiak and Josh Rickel, is based in Austin, Texas, and closed a $5 million seed round led by LiveOak Ventures in February 2024. The API collects from more than 230,000 sources (per company website; independently unverifiable) and returns articles with entities, topics, summaries and story clusters, plus Monitors that run saved queries on a schedule. All three plans are public: Individual at $25 a month for personal use, Startup at $250 with limited commercial rights, and Commercial at $1,250 with real-time data, an SLA and SSO. Below the Commercial tier, data carries a one-hour delay unless you buy the real-time add-on.
APITube
APITube markets a news API with filters for language, country, category, sentiment and entities, and aggregator listings put its coverage at 300,000 to 500,000 sources in about 60 languages (per company materials; independently unverifiable). Public profiles do not name the company behind it beyond a developer account located in Texas, and no founding date is published. Paid plans appear on its site, but third-party listings disagree on the figures. With no independent coverage audit and so little company information, run a careful trial before any commercial commitment.
Features: Perigon vs APITube
| Capability | Perigon | APITube |
|---|---|---|
| Full article text | ✓ | ✓ |
| Historical archive | ✓ | ✓ |
| NLP enrichment | ✓ | ✓ |
| Story/event clustering | ✓ | ✗ |
| Licensed publisher content | ✗ | ✗ |
| Streaming or webhooks | ✓ | ✗ |
| Free access | ✓ | ✓ |
Formats and SDKs: Perigon vs APITube
| Format / SDK | Perigon | APITube |
|---|---|---|
| REST API | ✓ | ✓ |
| Python SDK | ✓ | N/A |
| Node.js SDK | ✓ | N/A |
| Webhooks | ✓ | N/A |
| WebSocket | N/A | N/A |
| MCP server | N/A | N/A |
| S3/bulk delivery | N/A | N/A |
| BigQuery | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Perigon vs APITube
| Criterion | Perigon | APITube |
|---|---|---|
| Entry price | $25/mo | See pricing page |
| Pricing model | Monthly plans; add-ons for real-time and volume | Monthly plans; free tier |
| Access models | Free trial, Monthly plans, Enterprise contract | Free tier, Monthly plans |
| Price transparency | Public price | Quote only |
| Price tier | Budget | Enterprise / quote |
Who each API suits: Perigon vs APITube
| Dimension | Perigon | APITube |
|---|---|---|
| Buyer type | Individuals to enterprise | Individuals to enterprise |
| Typical uses | AI & LLM apps, Media monitoring, Risk & compliance | News & content apps, AI & LLM apps, Media monitoring |
| Example use cases | A startup building a news-aware product that needs commercial rights early. Brand or risk alerts driven by saved searches. | Testing alternative coverage against an existing provider. Small apps that need sentiment filters. |
| How you get access | Free trial | Free tier |
Perigon vs APITube: pros and cons
| Perigon | |
|---|---|
| + | Even the $25 tier returns entity and topic data instead of bare headlines |
| + | Monitors turn a saved query into a recurring alert without extra code |
| + | The Commercial tier bundles a 10+ year archive, an SLA and SSO in one price |
| + | License terms spell out that you are buying the structured data, which helps legal review |
| - | Real-time data costs extra below the $1,250 Commercial plan; otherwise expect a one-hour delay |
| - | Request quotas are tight for the price, with 10,000 a month on Startup |
| - | The license does not cover republishing full article text |
| APITube | |
|---|---|
| + | A wide set of filters, sentiment and entity fields among them |
| + | A free tier for testing |
| + | Regular developer posts on Medium and DEV |
| - | Coverage claims vary by source and lack independent checks |
| - | Company identity and size are unclear |
| - | Third-party price listings conflict |
Who should choose Perigon?
A typical fit: a startup building a news-aware product that needs commercial rights early.
Published plans from $25 with enrichment and saved-query monitors included. Paid access starts at $25/mo. Typical uses: AI & LLM apps, Media monitoring, Risk & compliance, Marketing & PR.
Who should choose APITube?
A typical fit: testing alternative coverage against an existing provider.
Entity and sentiment filters offered on lower tiers. Paid access is quote-based. Typical uses: News & content apps, AI & LLM apps, Media monitoring.
Decision matrix: Perigon vs APITube
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You want to start free before paying | Both |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Perigon |
| You need full article text in the response | Both |
| You need years of historical news | Both |
| You need licensed premium or wire content | Neither; look at Factiva, AP or LexisNexis |
| You are wiring news into an LLM agent | Perigon |
Use case fit: Perigon vs APITube
| Use case | Perigon fit | APITube fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI & LLM apps | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Media monitoring | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Risk & compliance | Strong | Limited | Perigon |
| Marketing & PR | Strong | Limited | Perigon |
| News & content apps | Limited | Strong | APITube |
Verdict: Perigon vs APITube
Perigon (4.5/5) is the stronger overall choice as a news data source. Published plans from $25 with enrichment and saved-query monitors included.
APITube (3.5/5) is worth a look if you need small apps that need sentiment filters. If your situation matches that, APITube is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Perigon vs APITube FAQ
Is Perigon better than APITube?
Perigon (4.5/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Perigon's strongest advantage: even the $25 tier returns entity and topic data instead of bare headlines. APITube's strongest advantage: a wide set of filters, sentiment and entity fields among them.
How do Perigon and APITube differ in pricing?
Perigon: monthly plans; add-ons for real-time and volume, with paid access from $25/mo. APITube: monthly plans; free tier, priced by quote. Both offer some free access for testing.
Which is better for enterprise: Perigon or APITube?
Perigon sells enterprise contracts with negotiated volume and SLA terms. Neither carries licensed publisher content, so check copyright terms before republishing anything.
What are the main differences between Perigon and APITube?
What sets Perigon apart: published plans from $25 with enrichment and saved-query monitors included. What sets APITube apart: entity and sentiment filters offered on lower tiers. They also differ on entry price ($25/mo vs See pricing page) and typical uses (AI & LLM apps, Media monitoring vs News & content apps, AI & LLM apps).
Verify all details directly with each API before making a decision.