Perigon vs Opoint: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Perigon (4.5/5) edges ahead of Opoint (4.2/5) overall. Perigon is the better choice for startups wanting enriched news with transparent tiers. Opoint is the stronger option for monitoring platforms and AML teams needing non-English coverage. The right pick depends on your budget, how much history you need and whether you need full text.
Perigon vs Opoint: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Perigon | Opoint |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2022 | 2001 |
| HQ | Austin, Texas, USA | Norway; owned by Infomedia (Denmark) |
| Team size | 11–50 | Not publicly disclosed |
| Rating | 4.5 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Published plans from $25 with enrichment and saved-query monitors included | Built as a wholesale feed with heavy non-English and local coverage |
| Pricing model | Monthly plans; add-ons for real-time and volume | Custom licence |
| Entry price | $25/mo | Custom quote |
| Formats & SDKs | REST API, JSON, Python SDK | REST API, JSON, XML |
| Typical uses | AI & LLM apps, Media monitoring, Risk & compliance, Marketing & PR | Media monitoring, Risk & compliance, Financial services, Marketing & PR |
Perigon vs Opoint: overview
Perigon
Perigon was founded in 2022 by Joshua Dziabiak and Josh Rickel, is based in Austin, Texas, and closed a $5 million seed round led by LiveOak Ventures in February 2024. The API collects from more than 230,000 sources (per company website; independently unverifiable) and returns articles with entities, topics, summaries and story clusters, plus Monitors that run saved queries on a schedule. All three plans are public: Individual at $25 a month for personal use, Startup at $250 with limited commercial rights, and Commercial at $1,250 with real-time data, an SLA and SSO. Below the Commercial tier, data carries a one-hour delay unless you buy the real-time add-on.
Opoint
Opoint has supplied news data since 2001 and belongs to Infomedia, the Nordic media-monitoring group owned by the Danish publishers JP/Politiken and Berlingske. It sells itself to monitoring platforms as their data supplier, with 250,000+ sources across 230 jurisdictions and 135 languages, roughly 60% of them non-English (per company website; independently unverifiable). Data arrives through an API or a push feed in JSON, XML or CSV. A separate adverse-media product targets anti-money-laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) checks, and all pricing is quote-based.
Features: Perigon vs Opoint
| Capability | Perigon | Opoint |
|---|---|---|
| Full article text | ✓ | ✓ |
| Historical archive | ✓ | ✓ |
| NLP enrichment | ✓ | ✓ |
| Story/event clustering | ✓ | ✗ |
| Licensed publisher content | ✗ | ✗ |
| Streaming or webhooks | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free access | ✓ | ✗ |
Formats and SDKs: Perigon vs Opoint
| Format / SDK | Perigon | Opoint |
|---|---|---|
| REST API | ✓ | ✓ |
| Python SDK | ✓ | N/A |
| Node.js SDK | ✓ | N/A |
| Webhooks | ✓ | N/A |
| WebSocket | N/A | N/A |
| MCP server | N/A | N/A |
| S3/bulk delivery | N/A | N/A |
| BigQuery | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Perigon vs Opoint
| Criterion | Perigon | Opoint |
|---|---|---|
| Entry price | $25/mo | Custom quote |
| Pricing model | Monthly plans; add-ons for real-time and volume | Custom licence |
| Access models | Free trial, Monthly plans, Enterprise contract | Enterprise contract |
| Price transparency | Public price | Quote only |
| Price tier | Budget | Enterprise / quote |
Who each API suits: Perigon vs Opoint
| Dimension | Perigon | Opoint |
|---|---|---|
| Buyer type | Individuals to enterprise | Enterprise only |
| Typical uses | AI & LLM apps, Media monitoring, Risk & compliance | Media monitoring, Risk & compliance, Financial services |
| Example use cases | A startup building a news-aware product that needs commercial rights early. Brand or risk alerts driven by saved searches. | Powering a media-monitoring product with global coverage. Adverse-media screening for AML and KYC. |
| How you get access | Free trial | Enterprise contract |
Perigon vs Opoint: pros and cons
| Perigon | |
|---|---|
| + | Even the $25 tier returns entity and topic data instead of bare headlines |
| + | Monitors turn a saved query into a recurring alert without extra code |
| + | The Commercial tier bundles a 10+ year archive, an SLA and SSO in one price |
| + | License terms spell out that you are buying the structured data, which helps legal review |
| - | Real-time data costs extra below the $1,250 Commercial plan; otherwise expect a one-hour delay |
| - | Request quotas are tight for the price, with 10,000 a month on Startup |
| - | The license does not cover republishing full article text |
| Opoint | |
|---|---|
| + | About 60% non-English coverage is unusually strong for Europe, Asia and Africa |
| + | Matching articles arrive in under seven minutes on average (per company website) |
| + | Push feeds and CSV or XML output suit platforms that ingest in bulk |
| + | Two decades of supplying monitoring companies |
| - | No public pricing or self-serve developer tier |
| - | Sold to platforms and enterprises, so individual developers are not the audience |
| - | Its owner Infomedia is itself a monitoring vendor, which matters if you compete with it |
Who should choose Perigon?
A typical fit: a startup building a news-aware product that needs commercial rights early.
Published plans from $25 with enrichment and saved-query monitors included. Paid access starts at $25/mo. Typical uses: AI & LLM apps, Media monitoring, Risk & compliance, Marketing & PR.
Who should choose Opoint?
A typical fit: powering a media-monitoring product with global coverage.
Built as a wholesale feed with heavy non-English and local coverage. Paid access is quote-based. Typical uses: Media monitoring, Risk & compliance, Financial services, Marketing & PR.
Decision matrix: Perigon vs Opoint
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You want to start free before paying | Perigon |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Perigon |
| You need full article text in the response | Both |
| You need years of historical news | Both |
| You need licensed premium or wire content | Neither; look at Factiva, AP or LexisNexis |
| You are wiring news into an LLM agent | Perigon |
Use case fit: Perigon vs Opoint
| Use case | Perigon fit | Opoint fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI & LLM apps | Strong | Limited | Perigon |
| Media monitoring | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Risk & compliance | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Marketing & PR | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Financial services | Limited | Strong | Opoint |
Verdict: Perigon vs Opoint
Perigon (4.5/5) is the stronger overall choice as a news data source. Published plans from $25 with enrichment and saved-query monitors included.
Opoint (4.2/5) is worth a look if you need adverse-media screening for AML and KYC. If your situation matches that, Opoint is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Perigon vs Opoint FAQ
Is Perigon better than Opoint?
Perigon (4.5/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Perigon's strongest advantage: even the $25 tier returns entity and topic data instead of bare headlines. Opoint's strongest advantage: about 60% non-English coverage is unusually strong for Europe, Asia and Africa.
How do Perigon and Opoint differ in pricing?
Perigon: monthly plans; add-ons for real-time and volume, with paid access from $25/mo. Opoint: custom licence, priced by quote. Only Perigon offers free access.
Which is better for enterprise: Perigon or Opoint?
Both sell enterprise contracts. Neither carries licensed publisher content, so check copyright terms before republishing anything.
What are the main differences between Perigon and Opoint?
What sets Perigon apart: published plans from $25 with enrichment and saved-query monitors included. What sets Opoint apart: built as a wholesale feed with heavy non-English and local coverage. They also differ on entry price ($25/mo vs Custom quote) and typical uses (AI & LLM apps, Media monitoring vs Media monitoring, Risk & compliance).
Verify all details directly with each API before making a decision.