Webz.io vs Finnhub: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Webz.io (4.4/5) edges ahead of Finnhub (3.6/5) overall. Webz.io is the better choice for data teams needing deep archives and broad source coverage. Finnhub is the stronger option for developers who need market data and news from one key. The right pick depends on your budget, how much history you need and whether you need full text.
Webz.io vs Finnhub: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Webz.io | Finnhub |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2014 | 2018 |
| HQ | Tel Aviv area, Israel | New York, USA |
| Team size | 51–200 | Not publicly disclosed |
| Rating | 4.4 / 5 | 3.6 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Largest claimed source count on this list and history going back to 2008 | Company news bundled with quotes, fundamentals and estimates |
| Pricing model | Usage-based credits; pay-as-you-go or subscription | Free key; paid market-data bundles |
| Entry price | Pay-as-you-go | Varies by data bundle |
| Formats & SDKs | REST API, JSON, Python SDK | REST API, JSON, WebSocket |
| Typical uses | Risk & compliance, Media monitoring, AI & LLM apps, Research & academia | Financial services, Research & academia |
Webz.io vs Finnhub: overview
Webz.io
Webz.io started in 2014 as Webhose.io, later rebranded, and is headquartered in the Tel Aviv area under co-founder and CEO Ran Geva. Its News API claims 3.5 million new articles a day from 350,000+ sources in 170+ languages (per company website; independently unverifiable), and the same company sells blog, forum, review and dark-web feeds. Queries use a field syntax such as title:, language: and sentiment:, and anything older than 30 days goes through a separate archive that reaches back to 2008. Every account receives $5 of free credit a month, with pay-as-you-go and custom high-volume contracts above that.
Finnhub
Finnhub is a New York fintech founded in 2018, according to CB Insights, that sells stock, forex and crypto data over REST and WebSocket, with staff reported in New York, Mumbai, Sydney and Ho Chi Minh City. News is one feature among many. A free key returns a year of North American company news and general market headlines at up to 60 calls a minute, but it is meant for personal, non-commercial use, and low-latency news streaming is a premium feature. Commercial data bundles are priced on Finnhub's site, with the All-in-One plan listed at $1,000 a month.
Features: Webz.io vs Finnhub
| Capability | Webz.io | Finnhub |
|---|---|---|
| Full article text | ✓ | ✗ |
| Historical archive | ✓ | ✗ |
| NLP enrichment | ✓ | ✗ |
| Story/event clustering | ✗ | ✗ |
| Licensed publisher content | ✗ | ✗ |
| Streaming or webhooks | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free access | ✓ | ✓ |
Formats and SDKs: Webz.io vs Finnhub
| Format / SDK | Webz.io | Finnhub |
|---|---|---|
| REST API | ✓ | ✓ |
| Python SDK | ✓ | ✓ |
| Node.js SDK | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webhooks | N/A | N/A |
| WebSocket | N/A | ✓ |
| MCP server | N/A | N/A |
| S3/bulk delivery | ✓ | N/A |
| BigQuery | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Webz.io vs Finnhub
| Criterion | Webz.io | Finnhub |
|---|---|---|
| Entry price | Pay-as-you-go | Varies by data bundle |
| Pricing model | Usage-based credits; pay-as-you-go or subscription | Free key; paid market-data bundles |
| Access models | Free tier, Pay-as-you-go, Enterprise contract | Free tier, Monthly plans |
| Price transparency | Public price | Quote only |
| Price tier | Budget | Enterprise / quote |
Who each API suits: Webz.io vs Finnhub
| Dimension | Webz.io | Finnhub |
|---|---|---|
| Buyer type | Individuals to enterprise | Individuals to enterprise |
| Typical uses | Risk & compliance, Media monitoring, AI & LLM apps | Financial services, Research & academia |
| Example use cases | Training or evaluation datasets that need years of news history. Threat intelligence that mixes news with forums and dark-web sources. | Fintech prototypes that show news beside charts. Student and personal investing projects. |
| How you get access | Free tier | Free tier |
Webz.io vs Finnhub: pros and cons
| Webz.io | |
|---|---|
| + | The 2008 archive is the longest history among the web-crawled commercial APIs reviewed here |
| + | Each article carries trust flags for satire, bias and fake news, which helps filtering |
| + | The same account can pull forums, reviews and blogs if a project grows past news |
| + | A $5 monthly credit lets you test real queries without a card |
| - | Default rate limit is one request per second per token |
| - | Vendr reports a median annual spend of about $237,500 across Webz.io products, so serious contracts are expensive |
| - | The field-based query syntax takes longer to learn than plain keyword search |
| Finnhub | |
|---|---|
| + | A generous free rate limit of 60 calls a minute |
| + | One key for prices, fundamentals and news keeps fintech prototypes simple |
| + | Official SDKs in many languages |
| + | WebSocket support for streaming quotes |
| - | News is basic, with headlines and summaries but no full text |
| - | The free key is non-commercial |
| - | The low-latency news stream is a premium add-on |
Who should choose Webz.io?
A typical fit: training or evaluation datasets that need years of news history.
Largest claimed source count on this list and history going back to 2008. Paid access starts at Pay-as-you-go. Typical uses: Risk & compliance, Media monitoring, AI & LLM apps, Research & academia.
Who should choose Finnhub?
A typical fit: fintech prototypes that show news beside charts.
Company news bundled with quotes, fundamentals and estimates. Paid access is quote-based. Typical uses: Financial services, Research & academia.
Decision matrix: Webz.io vs Finnhub
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You want to start free before paying | Both |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Webz.io |
| You need full article text in the response | Webz.io |
| You need years of historical news | Webz.io |
| You need licensed premium or wire content | Neither; look at Factiva, AP or LexisNexis |
| You are wiring news into an LLM agent | Both work through plain REST calls |
Use case fit: Webz.io vs Finnhub
| Use case | Webz.io fit | Finnhub fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Risk & compliance | Strong | Limited | Webz.io |
| Media monitoring | Strong | Limited | Webz.io |
| AI & LLM apps | Strong | Limited | Webz.io |
| Research & academia | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Financial services | Limited | Strong | Finnhub |
Verdict: Webz.io vs Finnhub
Webz.io (4.4/5) is the stronger overall choice as a news data source. Largest claimed source count on this list and history going back to 2008.
Finnhub (3.6/5) is worth a look if you need student and personal investing projects. If your situation matches that, Finnhub is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Webz.io vs Finnhub FAQ
Is Webz.io better than Finnhub?
Webz.io (4.4/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Webz.io's strongest advantage: the 2008 archive is the longest history among the web-crawled commercial APIs reviewed here. Finnhub's strongest advantage: a generous free rate limit of 60 calls a minute.
How do Webz.io and Finnhub differ in pricing?
Webz.io: usage-based credits; pay-as-you-go or subscription, with paid access from Pay-as-you-go. Finnhub: free key; paid market-data bundles, priced by quote. Both offer some free access for testing.
Which is better for enterprise: Webz.io or Finnhub?
Webz.io sells enterprise contracts with negotiated volume and SLA terms. Neither carries licensed publisher content, so check copyright terms before republishing anything.
What are the main differences between Webz.io and Finnhub?
What sets Webz.io apart: largest claimed source count on this list and history going back to 2008. What sets Finnhub apart: company news bundled with quotes, fundamentals and estimates. They also differ on entry price (Pay-as-you-go vs Varies by data bundle) and typical uses (Risk & compliance, Media monitoring vs Financial services, Research & academia).
Verify all details directly with each API before making a decision.