Webz.io vs Opoint: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Webz.io (4.4/5) edges ahead of Opoint (4.2/5) overall. Webz.io is the better choice for data teams needing deep archives and broad source coverage. Opoint is the stronger option for monitoring platforms and AML teams needing non-English coverage. The right pick depends on your budget, how much history you need and whether you need full text.
Webz.io vs Opoint: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Webz.io | Opoint |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2014 | 2001 |
| HQ | Tel Aviv area, Israel | Norway; owned by Infomedia (Denmark) |
| Team size | 51–200 | Not publicly disclosed |
| Rating | 4.4 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Largest claimed source count on this list and history going back to 2008 | Built as a wholesale feed with heavy non-English and local coverage |
| Pricing model | Usage-based credits; pay-as-you-go or subscription | Custom licence |
| Entry price | Pay-as-you-go | Custom quote |
| Formats & SDKs | REST API, JSON, Python SDK | REST API, JSON, XML |
| Typical uses | Risk & compliance, Media monitoring, AI & LLM apps, Research & academia | Media monitoring, Risk & compliance, Financial services, Marketing & PR |
Webz.io vs Opoint: overview
Webz.io
Webz.io started in 2014 as Webhose.io, later rebranded, and is headquartered in the Tel Aviv area under co-founder and CEO Ran Geva. Its News API claims 3.5 million new articles a day from 350,000+ sources in 170+ languages (per company website; independently unverifiable), and the same company sells blog, forum, review and dark-web feeds. Queries use a field syntax such as title:, language: and sentiment:, and anything older than 30 days goes through a separate archive that reaches back to 2008. Every account receives $5 of free credit a month, with pay-as-you-go and custom high-volume contracts above that.
Opoint
Opoint has supplied news data since 2001 and belongs to Infomedia, the Nordic media-monitoring group owned by the Danish publishers JP/Politiken and Berlingske. It sells itself to monitoring platforms as their data supplier, with 250,000+ sources across 230 jurisdictions and 135 languages, roughly 60% of them non-English (per company website; independently unverifiable). Data arrives through an API or a push feed in JSON, XML or CSV. A separate adverse-media product targets anti-money-laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) checks, and all pricing is quote-based.
Features: Webz.io vs Opoint
| Capability | Webz.io | Opoint |
|---|---|---|
| Full article text | ✓ | ✓ |
| Historical archive | ✓ | ✓ |
| NLP enrichment | ✓ | ✓ |
| Story/event clustering | ✗ | ✗ |
| Licensed publisher content | ✗ | ✗ |
| Streaming or webhooks | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free access | ✓ | ✗ |
Formats and SDKs: Webz.io vs Opoint
| Format / SDK | Webz.io | Opoint |
|---|---|---|
| REST API | ✓ | ✓ |
| Python SDK | ✓ | N/A |
| Node.js SDK | ✓ | N/A |
| Webhooks | N/A | N/A |
| WebSocket | N/A | N/A |
| MCP server | N/A | N/A |
| S3/bulk delivery | ✓ | N/A |
| BigQuery | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Webz.io vs Opoint
| Criterion | Webz.io | Opoint |
|---|---|---|
| Entry price | Pay-as-you-go | Custom quote |
| Pricing model | Usage-based credits; pay-as-you-go or subscription | Custom licence |
| Access models | Free tier, Pay-as-you-go, Enterprise contract | Enterprise contract |
| Price transparency | Public price | Quote only |
| Price tier | Budget | Enterprise / quote |
Who each API suits: Webz.io vs Opoint
| Dimension | Webz.io | Opoint |
|---|---|---|
| Buyer type | Individuals to enterprise | Enterprise only |
| Typical uses | Risk & compliance, Media monitoring, AI & LLM apps | Media monitoring, Risk & compliance, Financial services |
| Example use cases | Training or evaluation datasets that need years of news history. Threat intelligence that mixes news with forums and dark-web sources. | Powering a media-monitoring product with global coverage. Adverse-media screening for AML and KYC. |
| How you get access | Free tier | Enterprise contract |
Webz.io vs Opoint: pros and cons
| Webz.io | |
|---|---|
| + | The 2008 archive is the longest history among the web-crawled commercial APIs reviewed here |
| + | Each article carries trust flags for satire, bias and fake news, which helps filtering |
| + | The same account can pull forums, reviews and blogs if a project grows past news |
| + | A $5 monthly credit lets you test real queries without a card |
| - | Default rate limit is one request per second per token |
| - | Vendr reports a median annual spend of about $237,500 across Webz.io products, so serious contracts are expensive |
| - | The field-based query syntax takes longer to learn than plain keyword search |
| Opoint | |
|---|---|
| + | About 60% non-English coverage is unusually strong for Europe, Asia and Africa |
| + | Matching articles arrive in under seven minutes on average (per company website) |
| + | Push feeds and CSV or XML output suit platforms that ingest in bulk |
| + | Two decades of supplying monitoring companies |
| - | No public pricing or self-serve developer tier |
| - | Sold to platforms and enterprises, so individual developers are not the audience |
| - | Its owner Infomedia is itself a monitoring vendor, which matters if you compete with it |
Who should choose Webz.io?
A typical fit: training or evaluation datasets that need years of news history.
Largest claimed source count on this list and history going back to 2008. Paid access starts at Pay-as-you-go. Typical uses: Risk & compliance, Media monitoring, AI & LLM apps, Research & academia.
Who should choose Opoint?
A typical fit: powering a media-monitoring product with global coverage.
Built as a wholesale feed with heavy non-English and local coverage. Paid access is quote-based. Typical uses: Media monitoring, Risk & compliance, Financial services, Marketing & PR.
Decision matrix: Webz.io vs Opoint
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You want to start free before paying | Webz.io |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Webz.io |
| You need full article text in the response | Both |
| You need years of historical news | Both |
| You need licensed premium or wire content | Neither; look at Factiva, AP or LexisNexis |
| You are wiring news into an LLM agent | Both work through plain REST calls |
Use case fit: Webz.io vs Opoint
| Use case | Webz.io fit | Opoint fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Risk & compliance | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Media monitoring | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| AI & LLM apps | Strong | Limited | Webz.io |
| Research & academia | Strong | Limited | Webz.io |
| Financial services | Limited | Strong | Opoint |
| Marketing & PR | Limited | Strong | Opoint |
Verdict: Webz.io vs Opoint
Webz.io (4.4/5) is the stronger overall choice as a news data source. Largest claimed source count on this list and history going back to 2008.
Opoint (4.2/5) is worth a look if you need adverse-media screening for AML and KYC. If your situation matches that, Opoint is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Webz.io vs Opoint FAQ
Is Webz.io better than Opoint?
Webz.io (4.4/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Webz.io's strongest advantage: the 2008 archive is the longest history among the web-crawled commercial APIs reviewed here. Opoint's strongest advantage: about 60% non-English coverage is unusually strong for Europe, Asia and Africa.
How do Webz.io and Opoint differ in pricing?
Webz.io: usage-based credits; pay-as-you-go or subscription, with paid access from Pay-as-you-go. Opoint: custom licence, priced by quote. Only Webz.io offers free access.
Which is better for enterprise: Webz.io or Opoint?
Both sell enterprise contracts. Neither carries licensed publisher content, so check copyright terms before republishing anything.
What are the main differences between Webz.io and Opoint?
What sets Webz.io apart: largest claimed source count on this list and history going back to 2008. What sets Opoint apart: built as a wholesale feed with heavy non-English and local coverage. They also differ on entry price (Pay-as-you-go vs Custom quote) and typical uses (Risk & compliance, Media monitoring vs Media monitoring, Risk & compliance).
Verify all details directly with each API before making a decision.